Vol. 26, No. 1 |
Spring (April-June)
2002 |
10 Lies the Church Tells Women: How the Bible
Has Been Misused to Keep Women in Spiritual Bondage
by J. Lee Grady
Lake Mary, Florida: Creation House, 2000
220 pp., paperback, $12.99.
Reviewed by Nancy A.
Hardesty
Biblical feminists would certainly agree with
J. Lee Grady's list of lies the church has told, including
"God created women as inferior beings, designed to serve
their husbands"; "Women are not equipped to assume
leadership roles in the church"; "Women must not teach
or preach to men in a church setting"; "A woman should
view her husband as the 'priest of the home'"; "Women
are more easily deceived than men"; "Women can't be
fulfilled or spiritually effective without a husband and
children"; and "Women shouldn't work outside the
home."
| |
|
In Strange Company
by Letha Dawson Scanzoni
When a review copy of Grady's book,
Ten Lies the
Church Tells Women arrived at the EEWC Update office,
I quickly perused it before sending it out for review.
Grady's introduction stated that each chapter would
begin with "shocking quotes from various
theologians ranging from respected church fathers such
as Origen and St. Augustine to brave reformers such as
Martin Luther and John Knox." He said these were
"men greatly used by God" but they
"harbored wrong beliefs about the inferiority of
women."
The quotes were familiar to me, and I
agreed with Grady about the errors made by church
leaders throughout history in teaching about the roles
and relationships of women and men.
But when I got to
the "shocking" introductory quotes for Lie #
4 ("A woman should view her husband as the
"priest of the home"), I was stunned.
Because the three quotations cited in support of this
notion came from Thomas Aquinas, John R. Rice, and --
me!
Read More... |
|
|
| |
|
|
Grady, the editor of Charisma magazine
and father of four daughters, argues forcefully for the ministry
of women in whatever field God calls them to serve. He decries the
church's silencing of women down through the centuries. He
encourages equality in marriage and parenting. He criticizes the
prejudices that discourage single women from fulfilling careers
and church service. Grady seems unaware that this is the message
that EEWC and others have been preaching for the past
quarter-century.
Grady also perpetuates a few lies and
stereotypes of his own in this book. He says the "secular
feminist movement . . . teaches women to hate men and to kill
unborn babies" (p. 81). He asserts that confining women to
their homes ("closeted as a slave") "is taught
rigidly by Muslims, who also insist that women must wear
veils" (p. 161). In truth, the Quran only says women should
dress modestly (which has, as in Christianity, been defined
differently by different cultures). Grady also vilifies the Jews
of Jesus' day by pointing to the fact that they "segregated
[women] from men in the synagogues" (p. 10). He is obviously
unaware that Norwegian stave churches have separate entrances for
men and women and that men and women still sit separately in some
Christian congregations (e.g., among the Amish). Even Methodists
did so until very late in the nineteenth century. He blames
first-century Jews for the doctrine of original sin (p. 11), which
was really concocted in the fifth century by Augustine, a
Christian bishop in north Africa.
Alongside denunciations of "faulty
biblical interpretation" practiced by Crusaders, South
African supporters of apartheid, Southern defenders of slavery,
and Hitler, Grady lists "several pro-homosexual religious
groups" that "twist verses of the Bible to teach that
God condones gay sex." Grady seems oblivious to the fact that
opponents of his own efforts would make similar charges. Some
church members, including President George Bush, are still using
"biblical passages about Israel's wars with enemy nations to
defend violence against Muslims," which Grady labels as a
"misreading" by earlier Crusaders (p. 7). Grady admits
that some Christians still use Scripture to denigrate people of
color. But it apparently does not occur to him that his certainty
that the Bible "flatly condemns homosexual behavior" (p.
9) may be just as antiquated, prejudiced, and misguided as the
views he condemns.
Grady's heart may be in the right place with
regard to women's roles and rights, but his research and thinking
are incredibly shallow and sloppy [see sidebar]. He refers
frequently to church history, but with little cultural
understanding. Almost 40 percent of his citations come from two
sources: Ruth Tucker's and Walter Liefeld's Daughters of the
Church, and Carroll Osburn's Essays on Women in Earliest
Christianity. Tucker and Liefeld offer a fine overview of
women and ministry across the past two millennia, but they often
cite quotations from original sources that they found in secondary
monographs, which Grady then cites third-hand -- and edits to fit
his point or modern linguistic conventions! Another 13 percent of
Grady's sources are from random Internet sites. The only serious
work of biblical exegesis he cites is Richard and Catherine Clark
Kroeger's I Suffer Not a Woman.
We can only hope that readers of Grady's book
will be motivated by his Good News for women to do their own
research. Biblical feminism is far better grounded in Scripture
and church history than Grady demonstrates.
Reviewer Nancy Hardesty
is Professor of Religion at Clemson University in South Carolina.
She is author of Inclusive Language in the Church; Women Called
to Witness: Evangelical Feminism in the Nineteenth Century;
and co-author, with Letha Scanzoni, of All We're Meant to Be:
Biblical Feminism for Today.
© 2002
Evangelical and Ecumenical Women's Caucus
|